11 reasons why Emma Watson has totally vanished after Harry Potter – She tried so hard but we are not just feeling her (With Pics)


The Harry Potter franchise started as a book series written by the British author, J.K. Rowling. Seven books became eight films. Chris Columbus, Alfonso Cuarón, Mike Newell, and David Yates were the directors of the movies. Harry Potter changed way more than Rowling’s life. A lot of young actors became famous after being part of our favorite wizarding world. Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, and Emma Watson are the Harry Potter franchise’s biggest stars. After the films ended, J.K. Rowling started working in Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them, a spin-off and prequel to the Harry Potter movies. Nowadays, Radcliffe, Grint, and Watson are free to pursue any career path they want to. When you are young, famous and rich, the sky is the limit! Right?


What did Emma Watson choose to do? She continued her studies on English Literature in Brown University. She became a UN goodwill ambassador. She starred in indies like The Perks of Being a Wallflower and The Bling Ring. She worked with directors such as Aronofsky, Gallenberger, Amenábar, Condon, and Ponsoldt. You might say she has an impressive career. But, despite that, it seems like Hollywood has dropped her. Read below to see why this might be happening.

11 She is an average actress

Via: 100hdwallpapers

Some of Watson’s fans may say she is an incredibly gifted actress, but she is not. Let’s face the facts. First, let’s compare her with someone close to her age. Elle Fanning seems like a good option. Emma is older than Elle, but Elle started acting earlier. Emma is 28 years old. She has had roles in 21 productions, including films, tv series, and shorts. Elle Fanning is 20 years old and she took part in 57 productions. Not bad, right? Being a great actor is a matter of practice and hard work. The more productions, the merrier. If we only consider the numbers, Elle is better than Emma.

Now, let’s talk about nominations and awards. Kristen Stewart was born on April 9, 1990— six days before Emma Watson. Let’s compare them. Stewart has 67 award nominations. She had 48 wins, including a Bafta award. Kristen directed three shorts. Emma has 59 nominations and 23 wins. No Bafta. No directing experiences. Again, someone is better than Emma. Sorry, but Emma is not as good as Hermione, our favorite Watson’s character. We are sorry, but there are a lot of young actresses better than Emma. Think about Jennifer Lawrence, Brie Larson, or Emma Stone.

10 She is not a Kardashian

Via: elle

That is right. Emma Watson is not a Kardashian. Almost everyone knows who the Kardashians are. Even the biggest celebrities have an opinion on them.

For example, people like Millie Bobby Brown, Adele, and Jennifer Aniston love them. Jon Hamm, Reese Witherspoon, Anna Wintour, and Barack Obama are not fans of theirs. People love or hate the Kardashians— the strong reaction to them is great for business. It is no secret that one of the keys to be successful in the show business is to keep everyone talking about you.

Emma Watson is not the kind of person who makes her life a show. She’s a very private woman. If you check the Kardashians show, you may discover a lot about them. Their favorite food, their shoe size, their fears. What do you know about Watson? If you check her Instagram account, you can see a bunch of books. Okay, she loves books, fashion, and feminism. Anything else? No. If Emma was a more open person, she would be a more profitable celebrity. Hollywood understands she is not a showgirl, she will not be on tabloids, and she won’t lose control. She is not headlines material.

Use your ← → (arrow) keys to browse

Leave a Reply